Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalem Mama
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kalem Mama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, not much of an article. Night Ranger (talk) 23:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - seems to have been the second biggest movie at the time in Egypt, using [1] and [2] to compare... it seems to have grossed in week one at least 5 times more than X-Men 2 did in its first week. I suspect it's an Arabic Language film, which may explain why there are few sources. The film is known in English as 'Talk to Mama'. The Cavalry (Message me) 14:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I should also note that it stars two people, Abla Kamel and Hassan Hussni, who are considered B-List Egyptian stars: indeed, this site describes them as "prominent actors". The Arabic title for the movie is 'كلم ماما' The Cavalry (Message me) 14:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per The Cavalry's work, enough to presume the notability of this film.--Cavarrone (talk) 21:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Title in Arabic:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Keep per Cavalry's work in shining the light. A lack of English language sources simply means we spend the time to use time and regular editing to translate and use the plethora of available Arabic language ones.[3] Non-English notability, even if only to the Arabic world, is fine with en.Wikipedia. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.