Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalazist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:56, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kalazist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-English neologism, eight Google results for the Anglicised version, three for the Persian. No working sources provided. Article creator has been adding "www.kalazist.ir is a practical example of this new word" so this is most likely just oblique spam. McGeddon (talk) 11:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete simply because there's nothing to suggest possible improvement and my searches instantly found nothing with this particularly finding nothing good and only foreign websites (that I'm even wary of clicking). SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - even if this were a real word, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Korny O'Near (talk) 00:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Another poor quality dictionary definition/neologism. WP:NOTDICT. --Michig (talk) 13:57, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.