Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalayaan Broadcasting System

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 05:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kalayaan Broadcasting System

Kalayaan Broadcasting System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find reliable sources establishing the subject's notability even this article can't cite them, therefore non-notable.

I am also nominating the following page for the same reason:

Balitang Gawasnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Theenjay36 (talk) 04:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. The subject does not have enough coverage in reliable sources. The only reliable source that I got is that the Philippine Congress grants them with a franchise, but that's not enough. 112.198.83.188 (talk) 03:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lenticel, any thoughts about this? Sorry for pinging you here. theenjay36 03:47, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I have the same findings as 112--Lenticel (talk) 10:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.