Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KairUs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. as copyvio of the sources below, and the reason it was speedied previously as well. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KairUs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet general notability guidelines. No sources have been supplied, but papers by the subjects (mentioned in the article as "notable") have been offered as "references". Promotional, proprietary tone. Strongly suspect conflict of interest. ubiquity (talk) 18:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 15:30, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDY DELETE G12 (Copyright violation). Content is pulled from, in order, [1], [2], [3], [4], [kairus.org/redakar-arts-festival/], and t a list of publications, which is not eo ipso a copyvio, but does round out that all the content was pulled from other sources which explicitly claim copyright on the pages. Crow^Caw 22:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.