Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kafald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Whether it should be moved is up to subsequent editing. Geschichte (talk) 20:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kafald

Kafald (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 16:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep — Passes WP:GEOLAND as an officially recognized village. The 2011 census handbook spells the name as "Kaphald", and it's apparently a gram panchayat with a total population of 101 (see pages 291, 336-45, and 676). 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:GEOLAND. As noted above, the village seems to registered in census as Kaphald, an alternate spelling of Kafald. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.