Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaash Agar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaash Agar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeated despeedied/de-PRODDED by its COI creator, this atrociously written article does not (yet) meet WP:NFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

production:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL): WP:INDAFD: "Kaash Agar" "Noor Aalam" "Govind Kumar" "Paras Kumar" "Sanjay Kumar" "Koshi Alok Production"

Michael has cleaned the layout issues up greatly. Thanks. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It was easy enough to correct its "atrocious" format[1], so THAT by itself would not be a valid deletion rationale... however, I do agree with a Delete per it (at best) being TOO SOON. It was apparently released in July,[2] but does not (yet) have the level of sourcability to meet WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches didn't reveal anything to show it meets WP:NFILM. Most likely WP:TOOSOON. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.