Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaalaippani

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kaalaippani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Under-sourced film. Couldn't find any sources. Why is it notable? TamilMirchi (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussionsTamilMirchi (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Neutral Fan: For the film to be notable, there must be reviews from notable sources, which are not present in the article (i.e. The Hindu) TamilMirchi (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom, no notable sources found online. As for Neutral Fan's rationale that the film includes notable actors and directors...this is irrelevant (as has been pointed out to me when I tried to use this defense for another film). The film itself must past the WP:NFILM criteria, and, unfortunately, having a notable person attached to the film is not part of that criteria. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.