Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaal Sarp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 11:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kaal Sarp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is unreferenced wordsoup and the topic is not notable. Even if notable, it would be easier to start over, since this is completely unsalvageable. Nuke it from space. Bueller 007 (talk) 01:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Can't find a reliable source about this. Though, a lot of sources seem to be not English, where I can't comment. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 01:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Notable, thus keep. But start over from nothing. D4iNa4 (talk) 11:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. no reliable evidence for what it actually is. DGG ( talk ) 07:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as there's simply no better context and of course no obvious signs of better improvements. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.