Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KTM 50 SX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closed a bit early per WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KTM 50 SX

Nominating this page and multiple related placeholder pages:

Pages are either empty placeholders, infoboxes only, or articles with too little information. It's also unclear whether they merit separate entries, particularly for closely related models (like "KTM 250 XC-W" and "KTM 250 XC-W Street").

This was part of a large batch of placeholder articles created more than 2 weeks ago. Roughly half the batch was speedied for no content. Speedy was declined by another admin for these pages, citing the "under contruction" tag, which has since expired (a couple missed being speedy tagged altogether). Hairhorn (talk) 14:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, perhaps these are notable but there's no good reason to keep pages that provide no information other than saying "____ is a motorcycle made by KTM". Nyttend (talk) 15:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as almost empty, placeholder articles with little notability. Tavix | Talk 16:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We can either delete all of these or make an article for every single motorcycle model ever made. Well. I think I speak on behalf of everyone when i say Delete all KMFDM FAN ^(talk!)
Delete all per Nyttend and Tavix. Thryduulf (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. As nominator says, these articles were given a reprieve by an admin who refused speedy deletion as they were under construction, but nothing has happened to them since. The manufacturer may be notable, and certain series of products may warrant individual articles, but no notability has been established for every individual model, nor is there any precedent for this. I42 (talk) 20:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: per above. Iowateen (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete per everyone.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 21:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete all for all the reasons listed above. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.