Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KTM 250 EXC-F

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. KTC (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KTM 250 EXC-F

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

list of specs from motorcycle encyclopedia with no text, no indication of notability Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but convert to proper article. Rcsprinter (chinwag) @ 17:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NOTSTATS. Zero claim of notability. Redirect to KTM#KTM models also acceptable. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 12:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it seems like it could be converted into a better article than it is now. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Here's an additional ref [1]. There is another in the article. That's multiple sources so I think we can keep it. ~KvnG 23:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.