Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSBZ
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- KSBZ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability, no citations. ReformedArsenal (talk) 01:41, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per WP:OUTCOMES#BROADCAST, radio stations are generally notable. Has the barest of notability based on FCC information and article doesn't even make any claims outside the format. Nate • (chatter) 03:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Nate. TBrandley 03:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep per Nate and per the previous AfDs which shows positive consensus that radio station articles are notable...like the one we had a couple days ago that was a SNOW Keep. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 12:57, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Updated with some history information. I have contacted User:Dravecky (our resident radio station wizard), he will probably update it further. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 14:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:BCAST and years of outcomes that hold government-licensed broadcast radio stations (and similar infrastructure articles) as generally notable. Also, I have expanded and improved this article with additional reliable sourcing. - Dravecky (talk) 00:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.