Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KC International Airlines

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that sourcing is inadequate, plus WP:CRYSTAL concerns. ansh666 20:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KC International Airlines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. The only sources look like press releases. Slatersteven (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter if it has a real Aircraft, what matters is coverage. And it has none.Slatersteven (talk) 09:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So A lot of trivial mentions, some demonstrating just why crystal is so important (a launch date of March, or was it January). So they have put back their launch date at least twice now. When they actually start flying the article could be recreated, at this time there is no guarantee of what their routs will even be.Slatersteven (talk) 09:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Nominator assumed that he sources cited are press releases. What he failed to realize is that none of the sources cited are press releases. CAPA is an independent organization and so is plane spotters. This is a lazy nomination and the nominator deserves a trout since his CSD was based on assumption that article was previously deleted and then he assumed that sources are press releases. Nominator should refrain from nominating articles from AfD. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant was that they are not in depth coverage, they are the kind of materiel that companies write about themselves and give out. Almost all of the mentions are trivial (with the other one disusing the arrival of their first aircraft), and little more then "We exist" (you will note I did not say they were press releases, I said they look like them). So a few trivial mentions (amounting to they exist) and a newspaper report about them reciving one aircraft (in my opinion) notability does not make.Slatersteven (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Planespotters is not considered reliable.--Jetstreamer Talk 16:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 13:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 13:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 13:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 13:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And from one of the sources "KC International Airlines once again filed service revision for its planned inaugural", then yes Crystalballing is an issue here. Hell they cannot even say when in August they intend to start flying.Slatersteven (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment commercial airlines are not "always notable"; as has been determined many times in other AfD discussions, airlines must satisfy WP:CORP just like any other companies. Having said that, I am reserving judgement at this time. YSSYguy (talk) 07:48, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
None that I could find. The only news I found is the airline receiving their first plane. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And no others, it is really logical to say an airline with one plane is going to be able to run a scheduled service?Slatersteven (talk) 11:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But it's a very shiny plane 😉
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news/67618-cambodias-kc-intl-airlines-secures-52mn-in-funding --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also I did find this: https://www.pilotcareercentre.com/Air-Carrier-PCC-Profile/4071/KC-International-Airlines --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So it is not even (At this time) licensed to operate aircraft.Slatersteven (talk) 11:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article says "The company is presently undergoing AOC Certification with an intended revenue services starting in early 2018 with planning for up to 25 aircraft in the next five years." And it's already mid 2018. Though it was last updated June 20, 2018. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You would have thought if they had been accredited they would have said so, so the latest information is they are still not certificated to operate as a commercial airline. Thus this must fail Crystal ball.Slatersteven (talk) 12:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just curious how could they have bought a plane without licensing? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 12:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The same way that Jeremy Clarkson did, I am not sure you need one to own a plane, just to operate it for commercial purposes.Slatersteven (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 08:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above raises more questions then answers, does it have an official website or Facebook page? How many staff does it have? An airline about to lunch in a day or so, and not one live update as to status or seat availability? Is it even still going?Slatersteven (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.facebook.com/KCAIRLINES/ seem their Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/KCAIRLINES/photos/a.726576217537052.1073741829.683705931824081/841613212700018/?type=3
https://www.facebook.com/KCAIRLINES/photos/a.726576217537052.1073741829.683705931824081/849890125205660/?type=3 --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 09:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And nothing since the middle (being generous) of July.
Ohh and http://kcairlines.com, ohh dear just how much more do we need to say "this is not even up and running yet".Slatersteven (talk) 09:38, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Odd as their website is still not operational, or do they have another?Slatersteven (talk) 09:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.