Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K3 en het ijsprinsesje

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K3 en het ijsprinsesje (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references in this article, so that this movie appears to be non-notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: "Appearing" non-notable is a reason to look for sources and even to add them, and is not one to delete simply due to "appearances"... specially as topic notability is to be determined through sources being available, and not through a lack of their being used. I invite you to study guidelines WP:NRVE and WP:NEXIST. Thanks. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 16:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with K3 (band). The band is notable. The band is notable for doing things like this movie. Yet the main K3 page doesn't mention this movie. The movie doesn't look notable independently, but it does look like the sort of thing that should be included in their main page. Often, this sort of thing is cruft and deletable, but given that this sort of thing is what K3 is known for, MERGE it. Fieari (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per having non-English coverage showing notability to Belgium and Netherlands: This for example. It can be spoken of in the K3 article, but meeting WP:NF is meeting NF, and lacking citations is a reason to add them... not to delete because someone else had not (yet) done it. While certainly the film received attention due to the cast, its notability is through coverage, no matter what inspired wide media attention. Not to WP:WAX too pointedly, but this is similar to Yellow Submarine (film) achieving a separate notability even though media interest was prompted by the involvement of The Beatles. Just sayin' Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per MichaelQSchmidt Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 11:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.