Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 Revenge Oceania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bizzarely, the "main" article here was also listed in another AfD and already deleted... The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K-1 Revenge Oceania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

also nominating:

Another useless series of qualifying results that do not meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2011 (UTC) LibStar (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Two of the "also nominating" articles were also listed at another AfD; I have removed them from here. The other two (the ones that remain) were untagged, and were blanked and redirected. I have reverted the blanking/redirecting, tagged them, and will be procedurally relisting this AfD in just a moment. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Routine sports coverage of events fail WP:SPORTSEVENT and lack independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 23:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all These articles are just routine sports coverage of events that lack independent sources and don't show notability. Astudent0 (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.