Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kálmán Balogh
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 10:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Kálmán Balogh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD was contested, but the article is still heavily promotional and the sources seem to be press releases or otherwise fail the test of independence. This is not a matter of a niche classical genre, but more of someone apparently on the fringes of a niche classical genre. Guy (Help!) 22:56, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 03:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Rough Guide to Hungary 2002 Page 454 "Kalman Balogh is one of the virtuosos of the cimbalom, ...", Global Minstrels 2006 "the arrival of Kalman Balogh's Gypsy Cimbalom Band on the world music scene offered not only some excellent music, but also an overdue corrective." and so on, dozens of refs in Google Books. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keepand rewrite; notable within genre. – SJ + 02:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- strong keep ; notable; the prizes are well sourced Karmela (talk) 04:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.