Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Eugene Evans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Eugene Evans

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I couldn't find any coverage of him in secondary sources. The article only cites a few interviews (which are primary sources), IMDB (not a reliable source) and a couple of dead links. Since it is impossible to write a quality article without secondary sources, and Wikipedia's guidelines require significant coverage in reliable secondary sources to be considered notable, the article should be deleted. Baronet13 (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I'm not seeing any additional reliable sourcing either. NASAvegas (talk) 16:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons noted above. DJ Cane (talk) 15:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No coverage in reliable sources. Even the HuffPost article is from a blog.

QuintinK (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. On one hand, the director's article is a great place to merge into all the articles about his films. One the other hand, there's very few secondary sources, primarily interviews, about the subject. Bearian (talk) 19:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.