Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Crack an Egg
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Just Crack an Egg
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Just Crack an Egg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable brand. It's not actually easy to google this since it's a common term, but I'm not finding much beyond the press releases and industry-niche coverage already provided. valereee (talk) 17:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. valereee (talk) 17:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I would say the closest thing we have to a usable source would be the Chicago Tribune article, but the attribution is not entirely clear. It seems to me that most, if not all, the content about the subject are directly from people associated with the company. I also see that it was PROD/PROD2 and DEPRODed end of May, can't say I remember whether it's normal to notify those people though. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable product due to no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.