Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junnie Cross

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Junnie Cross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cross's lone claim to notability is being Miss Delaware. As it stands this article has one source, which is neither fully indepdent, and I am not sure how much it would be considered reliable. To pass GNG we need multiple sources, and in a way that overcomes one event concerns. My search on google could not find any sources that provide indepth coverage of Cross as subject in a reliable source. There are probably a few from the time she was Miss Delaware, but unless shown otherwise there is no reason to suppose these are enough to establish notability beyond that one event. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.