Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julianna Guill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julianna Guill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An editor, Jenepidia10, has placed an AfD tag on this article without providing a reason, beyond the following at the talk page: "I propose to delete this page due to lack of notability." See also [1]. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Snow Keep – This a 'C-class' article, so there is no question that it is sufficiently sourced (and likely can be sourced further: see this discussion as well), and there is also no question that the subject easily clears WP:NACTOR since her breakthrough in Friday the 13th (2009 film). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep, subject clearly meets WP:NACTOR based on substantial roles, including a main role in a current TV series. BD2412 T 02:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep: subject has received plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:BASIC. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Most of her parts are bit parts or one-offs, other than the Sweet 16 movie, which itself seems barely notable for Wiki. Oaktree b (talk) 04:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Appears to meet WP:NACTOR 38.140.49.92 (talk) 06:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and North Carolina. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Certainly doesn’t seem to meet the notability guidelines.She has mostly only had very small roles which are not noteworthy. Shsuhxttuserjame (contribs • talk) 21:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) — Shsuhxttuserjame (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The same goes for User:Jenepidia10. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Swayed by the borderline coverage and arguments from several trusted editors for keep MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.