Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juicy sex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juicy sex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The project of non notable artist Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In spite of the article's claim that it is a "famous art project", the only reference I can find to it is on the artist's own web site. If there are any references to show that it is notable, I could not find them.--Gronk Oz (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no signs of better independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.