Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juengo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is another article for a non-notable startup. Academic Challenger (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Juengo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is an online startup that didn't make it. It was started in 2013 and appears to have gone offline a/o 2014. It doesn't meet WP:GNG because of the lack of substantive information about them- passing mentions have been trivial and about the fact that it was a 'startup.' Jip Orlando (talk) 21:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not a notable topic. Academicoffee71 (talk) 03:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as unambiguous advertising; no indications of notability or significance. I requested a G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. I could find nothing but business listings and nothing since 2014. It's a start-up, and has got 1-10 employees, but it appears there are just 2. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Agreed with coffman, this is a textbook G11, or at the very least A7. If it's disputed, that's fine, but this article shouldn't exist as it is and I don't think it can be brought up to speed. South Nashua (talk) 22:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.