Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jozef Karika
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 00:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jozef Karika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Slovakian author who's published books. No references, no notability is asserted. The article itself is pretty much a list of the books and nothing else. — Jean Calleo (talk) 01:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Karika is a notable Slovak personality. He is the author of two book bestsellers (V tieni mafie I + II). He was interviewed by significant Slovak newspapers and media (SME [1], Pravda [2], Slovak Radio [3] etc), which means that his works and activities are a subject of interest of Slovak public life. There is a possibility to write an informative and well referenced article about him. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Any chance you could add this assertion of notability to his article then? Not that it's your duty but there's hardly anyone else here who's sufficiently knowledgeable about the subject and can understand the language of the sources. And we can't just leave it like that indefinitely. You don't have to write a full article if you don't have that kind of time, just add pretty much what you said right here. — Jean Calleo (talk) 15:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per sources noted above. -- Whpq (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.