Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joyous Sounds
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Joyous Sounds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Music group with no 3rd party references to establish notability (the one ref is to the site of the recording studio); the initial edit of the article shows that their CD has very limited distribution (which it was promoting). The article has been independently cleaned up since creation, but the group still appears to be non-notable. Ros0709 (talk) 20:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable, fails WP:BAND. TopGearFreak 21:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable at all, fails WP:MUSIC. abf /talk to me/ 10:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: insufficient notability, per WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the AfD began, three references have been added: articles about the group in the local press. In terms of the general notability guideline, or WP:MUSIC criterion #1, (neither of which discourage the use of local sources to establish notability) this pushes it into the realm of a weak keep. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep What can I say? Tis the season! ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.