Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Chit Tun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Chit Tun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Complete and total puffery. No coverage whatsoever in any secondary sources, so far as I can see. schetm (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment-Almost seems like they just linked random people with the same name also on the links. Wgolf (talk) 02:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, most of the article dealing with accomplishments not sourced, only personal life, and at least some of those if not all those appear to be other people. AlbinoFerret 03:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no indication of notability and no reliable sources at all. Huon (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand how Wikipedia functions in regards to the editing process, however I do want to address the current page for deletion, Joshua Chit Tun. I did not create the article, I do agree there are too many links referenced to stubs etc., without second sources. However I assure you if one was diligent to do the research it is not hard to verify at all. In the end this is trivial and not my concern, I am confident in a few months there will be valid sources to meet your standards from a variety of news group. It is just prior to this I preferred to keep what I was working towards a private matter, nevertheless I am one to document all aspects of my life. Every page and every image for every year.

Wikipedia is not my thing. This was just to acknowledged your comments, as you are all the experts on Wikipedia, however I will continue to do and your comments are well noted, my team will make sure that the news covers my experiences.

To conclude, I would appreciate it since you know how to navigate Wikipedia to work with the individual who created the article to improve it so in that regards it meets all standards.

Thank you.

- Joshua Chit Tun — Preceding unsigned comment added by JC2016 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.