Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Aaron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Aaron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Secondary source to support the notability of the the singer. Primary sources like itunes, microsoft store, amazon, soundcloud, last.fm and some other video and music sharing sites are not enough to pass him WP:N. independentmusicawards.com source is asking for vote for him, searching on google news, I cant find a source for his awards winning. Mar11 (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete tentatively - As I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources in my search, either, I guess it comes down to whether the Independent Music Award qualifies for WP:MUSBIO #8. I'm thinking it's pretty far from e.g. a Grammy. And that would make sense with the lack of sourcing -- the reason a Grammy is a shortcut to notability is because if you win a Grammy you're more or less guaranteed to have been written about in reliable sources (not so, it would seem for this award). Also doesn't help that the article was written by a blocked paid editor. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Independent Music Awards don't cut it for WP:MUSICBIO #8. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No substantial coverage to pass even WP:MUSBIO #1, and the "Independent Music Award" does not appear to be notable, either, so #8 is likely failed. I also presume he's not this guy. GAB^gab 20:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as I noticed this earlier, by far nothing actually convincing here for a solidly better shown notable article. Delete until a better article is available, if ever. SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.