Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Lorenzo Cossío y Cosío

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

José Lorenzo Cossío y Cosío

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches in Gbooks and News are not revealing significant coverage in reliable sources about this subject. The subject appears to not meet WP:BASIC. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Extra sources added. Mexican judge, has a Museum Library named after him and an entry in Who's Notable in Mexico! Philafrenzy (talk) 15:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks fine to me. My Spanish is rather rusty, but I'd say if he was British or American there would be no question about him being notable. Edwardx (talk) 15:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, nice referencing on this deceased historical figure. — Cirt (talk) 05:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - per improvements in sourcing (within the article) that demonstrate the subject's notability, I withdraw this nomination. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.