Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jong school

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jong school

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reason as WP:AFD/Blussuvoll School, school with zero notability for ages 6 to 13. Geschichte (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Due to the article containing zero sources and there being just as few about it anywhere else from I can find. So, this article can clearly be deleted for not passing either WP:NORG or WP:GNG. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. Nothing that meeets SIGCOV from BEFORE, single source in article is not IS. // Timothy :: talk 00:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, No sign of notability, no sources Alex-h (talk) 10:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a primary school, we need a lot of sources to show notability. The only source here is the school's own website, we need much better sourcing than that.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above and my own standards. Bearian (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.