Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Stead (Photographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neutrality^talk 02:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Stead (Photographer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:23, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:Creative. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 11:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. At a glance, doesn't appear to be notable, but on the off-chance that it's kept, the article should be moved to Jonathan Stead (photographer). Jenks24 (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It appears from this that just two months ago he was disgruntledly finishing up an MA in photography. Now, there are people who do an MA in something like this when they have already attained some notability. The article does (vaguely) claim notability; I fear that this is just hot air but I hope to be proved wrong by some editor's provision of details and evidence. (Irrelevant, I know, but I'd say that his work is more interesting than that of at least one member of the staff of the MA program.) -- Hoary (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Gosh, using a pinhole camera and messy chemicals to make photographs! That's not just 20th century it is 19th century. Good luck to him. When he becomes notable, someone will write about him here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.