Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Main (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Still fails WP:ATHLETE (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Main (footballer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who has never played at a fully professional level. Previously deleted by AfD twice as Jon Main for that reason, and he has not as yet advanced any further in his career... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG with significant media coverage - which isn't suprising given his league-leading scoring. Nfitz (talk) 08:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obviously fails WP:ATH. Not enough significant media coverage to pass WP:GNG, beyond the odd name checks in match reports and other WP:NTEMP stuff. --Jimbo^[online] 15:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He fails Wp:ATHLETE, and not a lot of stuff to pass Wp:GNG that isn't related to a claim of him being the Blue Square South's highest-ever scorer (and I'm finding it difficult to find evidence of that). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 16:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a lot changed since last two deletions. Great local sportsman at his level maybe, but hasn't made it on the notability stage. Still fails ATHLETE, still fails GNG --ClubOranje^T 10:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per previous comments. He fails both WP:ATHLETE, and WP:GNG. There's no grounds for keeping this article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per previous debates (CSD G4). Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 23:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He failed the notability criteria in the first two nominations, and he still still fails them now. Being the leading scorer in a semi-pro league is hardly notable. Bettia (talk) 11:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He fails both WP:ATHLETE, and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 20:28, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and page protect, per third AfD. The article can be restored if he stays at Wimbledon after they knock Luton out of the playoffs to earn promotion. WFCforLife (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.