Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joke Bakare
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I am not swayed by the lackadaisical keep argument. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Joke Bakare
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joke Bakare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New page review. Promotional and partly unsourced bio tagged for notability since March. The lede makes the big claim that she is ‘best known for her contribution to the formalization of standards in the Nigerian Pharmaceutical industry’ which might well make her notable, but this claim is not supported by the sources. She has won some awards but they don’t really look notable either. Does not pass WP:BLP. Mccapra (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Em-mustapha talk 16:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Agree does not satisfy WP:BLP. Hughesdarren (talk) 13:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per BASIC and ANYBIO. Em-mustapha talk 12:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete — lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Press releases & mere announcements do not count for much hence the BASIC argument above is rendered invalid. Celestina007 14:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.