Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Paul II High School in Tarnów

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is 'keep' - per WP:RELIST Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Paul II High School in Tarnów

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing in this stub to say why this particular high school is notable. — Kpalion^(talk) 22:18, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion^(talk) 22:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion^(talk) 22:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – per longstanding consensus that verifiable high schools are permitted to have Wikipedia articles. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools). Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This would mean that all high schools are inherently notable if only it can be verified that they exist. This is not what out notability guideline for organizations says: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is. (...) When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education." — Kpalion^(talk) 07:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the problem is, that as currently entitled, we can't verify the existence of this school, and the history section makes no sense. Was this high school renamed recently? Bearian (talk) 21:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you expect sources to use the English translation of the name of this school? Of course we can verify the existence of this school by simply following the link to the Polish Wikipedia article and its references, or by searching for sources such as this one. And the school has obviously been renamed at some point, because John Paul II didn't take that name until 1979, and no school in Poland would have been named after a Catholic leader before 1989. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'd assume good faith on the printed sources. The question, however, is not whether the school exists, but whether its mere existence makes it notable. — Kpalion^(talk) 23:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 04:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As can be seen from the titles of the print sources listed in the article, the school was known by the name of Stanislaw Anioł (whose Polish Wikipedia biography is here) until 2005. The linked Polish Wikipedia article on the school includes a history of the difficulties of its formation in the 1940s. No reason to go against normal consensus on notability of high schools. AllyD (talk) 05:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the general convention of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Verifiable high schools are usually automatically considered notable. TBrandley (T • C • B) 07:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have verified this school's notability online, with the help of User:Kpalion and Google Translate. Bearian (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.