Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Nursall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 19:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Nursall

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced BLP of a filmmaker, not making any strong claim to passing our notability criteria for filmmakers. The only notability claim even being attempted here is that he exists, which is not automatically enough in and of itself, and there's absolutely no sourcing being shown to demonstrate that he or his work have been a subject of coverage and analysis in real media. There were previously sources here, but right across the board they were primary sources of the staff-profile and film-credit-metasourced-to-itself varieties, not notability-building media coverage -- and even on a search for other sources, I can't find much of anything better.
Simply existing is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 19:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 19:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no refs in the article and I could not make up for it searching independently. No notability as per WP:GNG. Rkieferbaum (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not finding significant coverage of the subject and not getting any indications that it might exist either. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a search in Google did not yield in much. Fails notability.Pershkoviski (talk) 20:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also could not find much on this. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.