Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Michael Bermingham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USS John M. Bermingham. Consensus was to redirect to the ship. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Michael Bermingham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes WP:ANYBIO. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does not pass WP:ANYBIO. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to USS John M. Bermingham. Fails WP:SOLDIER (LtCDR awarded a posthumous Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to USS John M. Bermingham. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergeable content here (sadly there are next to no inline refs in the article, but we an probably AGF the content...). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the article on the ship.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to USS John M. Bermingham as the ships' namesake. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect and Merge to USS John M. Bermingham, it's more appropriate to have relevant information about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:10, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.