Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lanaway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Lanaway

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable working man. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 18:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and United States of America. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG, the only thing I found is something the subject died 5 days ago. Jumpytoo Talk 19:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Also only found that obit. I also note that article was created by a single purpose account that has been blocked (Magna82) followed shortly by another account (Whodoneit22) that was blocked as a sockpuppet. Lamona (talk) 05:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn’t find decent sourcing when I prodded it. Mccapra (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is written like a résumé, not like an encyclopedia article, and it's neither making nor reliably sourcing any strong notability claim beyond "subject was a person who had jobs". But as always, a person's notability doesn't vest in the things the article says, it vests in the quality of the sources that can or can't be shown to demonstrate that the things it says have earned him coverage and analysis in media and/or books. Bearcat (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.