Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kok

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Kok

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A philosophy lecturer that spent much of his time at Dordt College. Tagged for notability since 2011. Two primary refs in the article and before not returning much I can see. Szzuk (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. He has apparently written or edited several books, but I could only find two reliably published reviews, one for a book he wrote and one for a book he edited. I think that falls a little short of WP:AUTHOR, and no other form of notability is evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Two books, and two reviews in the same journal, hardly qualifies for notability as an author, and it is hard to tell how he could be considered notable as an academic. Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NACADEMIC. Hzh (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.