Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cena-Edge rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Jenks24 (talk) 06:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena-Edge rivalry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, undue weight, original research, content covered in existing Wikipedia articles. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Archive_85#Triple H-Undertaker rivalry and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling#Rivalry pages. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following similar pages by the same creator for the same reasons:

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 22. Snotbot t • c » 00:34, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Unencyclopaedic overanalysis of television storylines from an in-universe perspective + per nominator's arguments. The fact that the information may be accurate is irrelevant. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 09:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 09:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 09:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete two, weak keep for Austin vs McMahon. As the Austin-McMahon conflict was the staple of the Attitude Era which eventually led to the end of the Monday Night Wars and the dissolving of WCW and ECW, I'd say that Austin-McMahon can stay if it is made a little more encyclopaedic and less of a history lesson. – Richard BB 10:08, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Austin-McMahon rivalry is already covered in large and detailed sections of Stone_Cold_Steve_Austin and Vince McMahon and mentioned in the Austin article's lead paragraph. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, "content covered in existing Wikipedia articles". --Hydao (talk) 20:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Can not even incorporate material as articles were created simulacrum from existing pages. Papacha (talk) 08:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are other rivalries on Wikipedia including Austin/McMahon, John Cena/Edge and Triple H/Undertaker--Mjs1991 (talk) 12:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those three articles are being considered here as a group. They are similar enough and the reasons for nominating each are the same. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.