Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe The Peacock" on Wikipedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made...3 KB (299 words) - 06:47, 7 February 2023
- April 2007 (UTC) Joe Peacock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Blogger but the article lacks any...6 KB (748 words) - 06:46, 7 February 2023
- doesn't seem to be the necessary reliable sources to establish sufficient notability to meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. Peacock (talk) 17:25, 4 October...4 KB (358 words) - 18:08, 2 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made...4 KB (362 words) - 06:44, 7 February 2023
- userspace please? I'd like to try and salvage at least some of the content for other articles. – Joe (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC) Comment: Please see...26 KB (2,511 words) - 14:26, 7 February 2023
- block log). Both usernames suggest they are the subject. At best it needs aggressive pruning of WP:PEACOCK, but actually I think it's a WP:TNT job. Guy...7 KB (630 words) - 10:40, 7 February 2023
- 5 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 18:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...4 KB (296 words) - 16:44, 6 February 2022
- Software-related deletion discussions. —MuZemike 04:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Delete no assertions of notability, and there are a few peacock terms in the article...3 KB (340 words) - 06:00, 4 February 2022
- October 2009 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 22:15, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Delete Non-notable. Peacock (talk) 23:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Keep:...5 KB (551 words) - 16:55, 14 December 2023
- significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 19:45, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Comment if we do delete this then The Bowmans (Hancock) becomes the primary meaning...3 KB (344 words) - 06:22, 9 February 2022
- in Google News for significant coverage is [1]. I found a lot of mentions in Google Books, but they are all trivial. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 17:26...8 KB (810 words) - 06:19, 4 February 2022
- as it currently stands. Peacock (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this book. Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 7 October...6 KB (645 words) - 08:42, 4 February 2022
- WP:GNG, I detect a strong whiff of WP:PEACOCK and WP:VSCA. There is also the issue of the potential for WP:COI through the initial edits of what seems to be...4 KB (365 words) - 20:03, 5 February 2023
- improving articles, blah, blah, blah) the current article is rife with puffery and peacocks, so it would need a fundamental re-write. Sorry, Bobby Jo, the article...7 KB (701 words) - 08:19, 15 February 2022
- not mention subject in any fashion whatsoever. Article is filled with peacock puffery and ephemeria like [ed:note, this sentence is about subject's father...5 KB (590 words) - 18:25, 2 February 2022
- From the German page for Joe Schocker here, it seems that there's some confusion as to whether BoXer even exists; Stenger is listed as frontman for both...4 KB (343 words) - 12:59, 7 February 2022
- 22 December 2016 (UTC) Delete Not notable, probable promotion / peacocking regarding the book that uses this term. —Grammardoc— talk 04:41, 22 December...8 KB (638 words) - 19:45, 8 February 2023
- google search reveals that he works for the company. Thus, there is a conflict of interest. The article also uses peacock terms. It should either be drafted...5 KB (445 words) - 20:05, 9 March 2022
- of the edit history for the article shows that Francis doesn't even hide the various sockpuppets he uses to engage in edit wars over this peacock article...7 KB (629 words) - 20:20, 6 February 2023
- [10], [11], [12], [13], and [14]. Joe Chill (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC) merge as appropriate to the company. The present article is a mere advertisement...5 KB (387 words) - 05:12, 1 February 2022
- July 2015 (UTC) The following discussion is closed: deleted 2015 publication. No license. May also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anirban Sen Gupta