Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Young-nam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep The result was keep WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Bruxton (talk) 12:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Young-nam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. The only sourced used in the article is actually more about a different person. The article is only 3 sentences long. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 16:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, and Bands and musicians. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 16:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:BEFORE, the Korean article's sources establish notability. small jars tc 17:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep Length of the article does not determine whether or not an article should be deleted or not. Regarding notability, as I've stated when removing the PROD, it absolutely exists. (The JoongAng Ilbo has a 44 article series about him, he's been the subject of countless independent non-trivial published works [1] [2] [3], and he won the top prize in radio at the 2010 MBC Drama Awards) :3 F4U (they/it) 17:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the sourcing in the Ko.wiki article confirms notability. Mccapra (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The nominator has not done a good job on researching this. There are plenty of citations, specifically check the news about his art fraud case. I have expanded on the article and added 7 new citations.Kakara69 (talk) 00:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per recently added citations by Kakara69. Subject definitely seems to be notable to me. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 01:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.