Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinmyeong Girls' High School (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jinmyeong Girls' High School

Jinmyeong Girls' High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article gives no indication of notability. A WP:BEFORE does not turn up anything relevant, so fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 12:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and South Korea. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This article gives a pretty good indication of notability. Jacona (talk) 15:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are many sources in Korean 진명여자고등학교 and Hanja 進明女子高等學校. I'm not good at those. But the notability of the subject is in little doubt from what could be found in English, including [1] and the sources currently in the article. The school was founded in 1906 as part of an attempt to provide modern, western education. It was taken over by the Japanese army in 1910, and in 1919 helped provide impetus to the March 1st movement. It could definitely use improvement by Korean or Hanja speakers.Jacona (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jacona's research. Indeed with proper attention from Korean-speaking editors there is likely plenty to say about this school. If/once this AfD is closed as keep I will clean up the inappropriate self-sourced statements so that it's a mostly blank slate. Ovinus (talk) 23:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.