Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmyism
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence of existence, let alone notability SilkTork *YES! 22:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jimmyism
- Jimmyism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologism, WP:MADEUP Passportguy (talk) 18:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, that's it in an eggshell. Drawn Some (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Being a neologism is not necessarily grounds for deletion, but being a non-notable one definitely is. I couldn't find anything substantial in Gnews, Gscholar, or Gbooks. Note that "jimmyism" was also used in other contexts, referring to other Jimmys as well. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Perhaps this is a local expression? In any event, no evidence of this as notable is found. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.