Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Payne (news anchor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Payne (news anchor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable television personality. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment:~~ the revdel'd copyvio content establishes he has won the Peabody Award and the Alfred I. duPont–Columbia University Award. I believe this establishes a claim to notability. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Having looked into these...the station won the awards for coverage Payne was involved in. WP:NOTINHERITED accordingly, and doesn't appear to be otherwise notable. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a total failure to have the multiple, independent, secondary reliable sources providing significant coverage that is the basic minimum of the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only source provided is not independent. Royal broil 14:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss The Bushranger's comment and investigate potential notability/where did that copyvio content come from? Can it be used as a RS?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:JOURNALIST. KidAd talk 01:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable journalist/local TV anchor. —Kbabej (talk) 03:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet WP:JOURNALIST. Rondolinda (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per all above, non-notable. JayJay^{What did I do?} 05:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.