Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JetBlue Flight 1416
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JetBlue Flight 1416 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable air crash per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:AIRCRASH. Though the NTSB did come out and do a report, the accident did not receive any substantial media coverage after the day of the accident, and no major changes to aviation safety were made as a result of the accident. SportingFlyer talk 22:32, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I thought NTSB report would give it significance (along with passing GNG), but WP:NOTNEWS is a strong argument here. No implications shown to anything in the future is something I should have connected the guideline with, but here we are. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:25, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, while the subject of the AfD has received significant coverage it is an event, and doesn't meet criteria set forth in WP:AIRCRASH for retention as a stand alone article nor does the event has a last effect. Therefore, while the incident can be included in a list of events regarding the type of aircraft (perhaps), as a single event it falls under WP:NOTNEWS.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 21:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTNEWS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable air crash per WP:NOTNEWS. SalmanZ (talk) 22:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Burst of coverage in 2014. Some minor coverage of a lawsuit in 2018,[1] which for me is not sufficient for WP:SUSTAINED] coverage. Icewhiz (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.