Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Hammond

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone would like the article userfied, please let me know. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Hammond

Jessica Hammond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only a few references about being in a television competition a decade ago. From a search, she still makes music but hasn't really been covered by significant coverage since. Nexus000 (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, I'm not necessarily for deletion. I'm unsure how I feel about this page. It may very well just need a cleanup. But I thought I'd open it to discussion. Nexus000 (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's several more but just had a quick look. I think there's enough coverage. -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)strike !vote of sock, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FlyboyExeter. Onel5969 TT me 12:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The sources, in-article and presented here, deserve further discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.