Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Carlson (Miss Oregon USA)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Oregon USA#Winners. (non-admin closure)Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Carlson (Miss Oregon USA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon USA. This does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. Legacypac (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 19:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I would have thought a state winner would naturally have sufficient coverage that this would be a slam dunk keep on notability. Amazingly, Jessica has since become a medical doctor. Every search I have thought of performing has not turned up any sources reflecting significant notability. Normally I would side with a delete reasoning, but I have a sense that I simply am not searching correctly. —EncMstr (talk) 08:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did she get married and change her name? Valfontis (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It seems she got her MD as Jessica Carlson, so no, traditionally she couldn't change her name. However I found some instances of DMDs and MDs changing their name (formerly not possible). —EncMstr (talk) 04:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
you would be shocked how little coverage Miss States usually get. They generally are not noteable. Legacypac (talk) 05:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.