Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Waits (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Note that "lots of mentions" generally does not add up to notability. bd2412 T 02:30, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Waits

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in 2010. Not seeing enough in the article or online to justify an article. Edwardx (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are a lot of mentions about his success in multiple third-party sources: [Featured in Las Vegas Weekly here], [by Nextshark here], [The Las Vegas Sun here], [Called a game changer by Nightclub & Bar here], . . . Orville1974 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:05, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mostly passing mentions in company release, and no concentrated coverage in major media. I do not see GNG I see promotional. Lubbad85 (☎) 17:13, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is not encyclopedic. Cox wasan (talk) 18:59, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.