Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Lonsdale

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 19:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Lonsdale

Jennifer Lonsdale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for a couple years, sourced only to the unreliable IMDB, there are some verifying mentions of this actress, so she is not a hoax, but she never seemed to get the press that the environmental activist of the same name has managed, everything I can find reliable and signficant is about the latter, not the former, and I have found no indication that the two are the same person. A redirect to That's My Boy would not be a concern as well, but if she does have independent notability I'd rather see the sources and improve the article. j⚛e deckertalk 20:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She had recurring roles in TV series such as That's My Boy, Doctor Who, Come Back Mrs. Noah, and The Cedar Tree. Possible confusion with the environmentalist doesn't mean this article should be deleted. Dcfc1988 (talk) 21:52, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed that the question isn't whether she is confused with someone we don't consider notable who has more signficant, reliable coverage, the question is whether she has enough signficant, reliable coverage to meet WP:BASIC. Do you believe she does? --j⚛e deckertalk 21:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly. She easily passes wp:ent - "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Dcfc1988 (talk) 00:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So, you believe the article is mistaken where it describes those roles as "minor" and/or "guest" appearances. I understand entirely, and recommend that you update the article with reliable sources backing your view. --j⚛e deckertalk 19:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 21:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:17, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.