Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayme Tiomno
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Kevin 10:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jayme Tiomno
This physicist seems to be very qualified, but there is currently no assertion of notability. It appears that this physicist is not quite notable for inclusion (unless someone can provide some sources that show that he is notable). DarthVader 04:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It looks from a scan of his bio and some of the Google hits like he passes the professor test. I'd slap expand and source tags on the article, but it isn't really deletable. RGTraynor 05:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's possible that those papers were seminal in their field. If that's not in the article, I can't say that he's notable. -- GWO
- Comment. Please reconsider your recommendation since notability is perhaps established because of the fact that Jayme Tiomno received the Brazilian Order of Scientific Merit. This notable award probably qualifies Jayme Tiomno for point 7 of the WP:PROFTEST. DarthVader 09:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if N can be better established. The Order of Scientific Merit puts him above the average prof. --Dhartung | Talk 07:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As member of a national science academy and holder of an order for his scientific work, he passes point 7 ("has received a notable award or honor") of WP:PROFTEST. (These are also clear assertions of notability, but were added after the nomination.) up+land 08:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I withdraw my nomination (there is still however currently a delete recommendation by GWO) and apologise for not checking thoroughly enough for notable awards. I did read through the external link website and also the pages of the first few hits on google, and I didn't see anything about this notable award. I did not however check the incoming links which would have lead me to the award page. DarthVader 09:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.