Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Torres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 04:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Torres (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-promotional and does not meet criteria of WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NACTOR. Citations provided are all of the press release type and I can't find a reliable source that discusses him significantly. ... discospinster _talk 02:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 02:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 02:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 02:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: As per nom, this is promotional and does not gather any notability. Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:ENT --Whiteguru (talk) 08:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Comment: Agree to draftify per Deb and Richard3120.Psycharpax (talk) 15:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Psycharpax (talk) 13:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Psycharpax (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. Richard3120 (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I can see an argument for keeping it but it is certainly promotional and definitely needs work. How about draftifying? Deb (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The sources are terrible. #2 and #10 are stating explicitly that they are paid for promoting artists. Too many typos and too much spam. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 01:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: the subject may be notable one day but right now this is definitely WP:TOOSOON. I can't speak for the sources from Puerto Rico, but Que Tal is a lightweight celebrity gossip magazine, and the text is the same as that in both the Noticieros 90 Minutos and La KW articles, so clearly these are not from independent sources but a press release. In fact, all the Colombian sources are just introductions to "watch his latest video below" stories, so they are all promotional. The greatest claim is that he has broken into the Colombian market, but as someone who lives there, he's far from a household name at the moment, and I can't find any evidence that he has ever charted in Colombia, or that any serious Colombian newspaper or magazine has ever mentioned him. Richard3120 (talk) 15:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.