Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Foreman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 17:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Foreman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see and can't find any reason this person is notable per WP:BIO. —Mike Allen 01:31, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 05:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creator's comment: Can we move this to WP:Article Incubator? --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 19:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to be a well-known businessman in the world of toys, see the media coverage of him. His most recent venture to gain press is a Justin Bieber doll, and "He's the man behind the Spice Girls dolls (11 million sold), the Britney Spears doll (7 million sold) and the wildly successful Hannah Montana doll (17 million sold)."[1] Fences&Windows 16:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Fences. Toys are big business, folks. Bearian (talk) 16:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Fences. Also, I can't blame the nominator much for this because the subject's google news juice is buried under hits for this Jay Foreman. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am inclined to say keep but it needs a little work. --Kumioko (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.