Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janette Sadik-Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janette Sadik-Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local un-elected official. Cerejota (talk) 03:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If someone passes WP:GNG (exhibits A, B, C, D, etc. etc. etc.), it doesn't matter if they fail WP:POLITICIAN. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:47, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep An appointed official can be notable if that person meets the general notability guideline. A Google News Archive search combined with the references already in the article shows that this person certainly does. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:53, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Janette is well known in the urban planning and transportation circles far beyond New York, and has been profiled in several of the larger New York magazines/papers. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 17:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Notable as per above. Joe Chill (talk) 22:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A clear case of when to not let WP:POLITICIAN cloud your perception of WP:BASIC. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nominator appears to believe being unelected is grounds for deletion. Not true at all. If she was an official in a small or even medium-sized city then she certainly wouldn't be worthy of an article, but the head of a major department in a city the size of New York is definitely notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep without a doubt, has sources, and is notable. CapMan07008 (talk) 13:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.